Turn on suggestions Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
Community Home Request Access Read Blogs Share Your Ideas Search Community View My Settings
Reply
Gold Super Contributor
Gold Super Contributor
RJLedger
Posts: 3,087
Registered: ‎03-19-2009

Possible bug in Salesfusion integration w/SData endpoint - adHocGroups

‎07-23-2014 01:40 PM

In version 8.1 the SData endpoint for AdHocGroup entity is exposed as adHocGroups.

 

Salesfusion documentation (page 27?) says one is to name that SData endpoint: addhocgroups. When questioned SF support says ".. it is correct.."

 

Looks like a BUG in the Salesfusion integration to me ;-)

--
RJ Ledger - rjledger@rjlSystems.net +1 603.369.3047 x101

".. Innovators in Mobility - Experts in Workflow Automation..."
http://www.rjlSystems.net - blog: www.rjlSystems.net/blog.html
Report Inappropriate Content
Message 1 of 2 (2,191 Views)
0 Kudos
Gold Super Contributor
Gold Super Contributor
RJLedger
Posts: 3,087
Registered: ‎03-19-2009

Re: Possible bug in Salesfusion integration w/SData endpoint - adHocGroups

[ Edited ]

‎07-24-2014 05:40 AM - edited ‎07-24-2014 05:41 AM

Teh following has NOT been verified/confirmed:

 

It is my understanding Salesfusion issued a "fix' yesterday (July 23,2014) around noon that will accept ALL the following for SData End-point naming is done in a non-case-sensitive manner:

      addhocgroups

      adHocGroups

 

 

Would someone from Salesfusion please comment/reply to this Saleslogix community post ASAP?

--
RJ Ledger - rjledger@rjlSystems.net +1 603.369.3047 x101

".. Innovators in Mobility - Experts in Workflow Automation..."
http://www.rjlSystems.net - blog: www.rjlSystems.net/blog.html
Report Inappropriate Content
Message 2 of 2 (2,189 Views)
0 Kudos